The Antifederalists
Read Online
Share

The Antifederalists

  • 410 Want to read
  • ·
  • 59 Currently reading

Published by Northeastern University Press in Boston .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • United States

Subjects:

  • Constitutional history -- United States -- Sources.,
  • United States -- Politics and government -- 1783-1789 -- Sources.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Statementedited by Cecelia M. Kenyon ; with a new foreword by Gordon S. Wood.
ContributionsKenyon, Cecelia M.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsJK155 .A58 1985
The Physical Object
Paginationcxxiii, 455 p. ;
Number of Pages455
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL2864268M
ISBN 100930350758
LC Control Number84027240

Download The Antifederalists

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

The Antifederalists book. Read 10 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. In this examination of the philosophical attitudes and politica /5. The Antifederalists and Federalists agreed on one thing: the future of the nation was at stake in the contest over the Constitution. George Mason The National Archives presents this biography of George Mason, one of the antifederalist leaders during the Constitutional Convention. He lobbied strongly for the creation of a separate "Bill of Rights.". The differences between the Federalists and the Antifederalists are vast and at times complex. Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states. The Antifederalists, as Herbert Storing has correctly suggested, criticized the Constitution and The Federalist criticized the Antifederalists. It makes sense, on the whole, however, to argue that the conversation took place at the founding at a thematic level rather than try to portray a conversation that took place at an individual specific.

For a quarter of a century between and , Americans intensely debated the nature of government and the need to protect individual liberties. The debate climaxed in the arguments over the ratification of the Constitution. Through a selection of essential documents from and , this new edition gives readers the flavor and immediacy of the great debate in all its fire, 1/5(1). What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution - Kindle edition by Storing, Herbert J., Murray Dry. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the /5(22). The Anti-Federalists were a group of politicians in early U.S. history. They had concerns about the new constitution that was adopted in They believed it gave too much power to the central, or federal, government. Anti-Federalists feared the authority of a single national government. Antifederalists: Selected full-text books and articles. The Antifederalist Papers By Morton Borden Michigan State University Press, Read preview Overview. The Antifederalists: Critics of the Constitution, By Jackson Turner Main University of North Carolina Press, Read preview Overview. The.

download. M. download. download 1 file. TORRENT download. download Files download 65 Original. SHOW ALL. IN COLLECTIONS. The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection. Audio Books & Poetry.   Get YouTube without the ads. Working Skip trial. 1 month free. Find out why Close. The Anti-Federalists Tom Richey. Loading.   The federalists and Antifederalists had many different views on the constitution. First off, federalists didn't think a bill of rights was necessary while Antifederalists did. The reason being they thought the lack of a bill of rights section would result in the loss of individuals rights. The Antifederalists were critics of the Constitution drafted by the Framers and submitted to the states for ratification in Some Antifederalists were unconditionally opposed to adopting the Constitution, while others demanded amendments or pressed for a second convention to correct the "errors" of the first.